His Last Sure Thing  
Days Of Glory  
What child of Reagan is not clambering aboard the Obama Express? The latest to endorse overcomes not only political differences, but the additional barrier of being dead.
Jeane Kirkpatrick is nominated a Hopenista by Allan Gerson, her former minion.
Why-ever would Obama accept?
Kirkpatrick shared with our current president the breezy confidence of the convinced, from her dismissal of junta killed American nuns in El Salvador [“The nuns were not just nuns; the nuns were political activists.“], to her coinage of the delightfully fag-baiting term “San Francisco Democrats“, to her passion for the surpassing weird Argentinian junta who killed 30,000 opponents while carefully stealing the children of the dead for adoption into military families.
Don’t worry though:
Kirkpatrick’s “Dictatorships & Double Standards” found it’s proudest expression in her work at the United Nations propping up Saddam Hussein. A UN condemnation of Iraq’s chemical warfare against Iraq was in the works, and working to kill the resolution was an especially sharp slicing of distinctions between ghastly regimes. When Iran repelled it’s Iraqi invaders Reagan himself was mobilized at the UN, not to condemn chemical warfare but to condemn Iran for trying to punish the aggressor.
Because as Gerson teaches us:
“she knew that the H-word in the diplomatic lexicon — “aggression” — should only be used sparingly. “
Dennis Hopper To GOP: We Blew It
13-Oct-08
Bored To Mild 
Further backwash from the failure of “An American Carol” to attract actual audiences:
Dennis Hopper now free to drop his right-wing wierdo guise to don some other kind of weirdo guise and endorse Barack Obama.
Ayers & Omissions
08-Oct-08
Who Is This Fancy Walter Annenberg? 
…and why did he pay for Chicago Reds like Barack Obama and William “Billy” Ayers to run wild?
The McCain campaign is super excited at all the play it is getting on Barack Obama’s 
 Red Ruffian friends, to the point where it isn’t even trying to make sense.
McCain’s breathless release headlines, “The Obama Campaign Claims Not To Know Details Of Ayers’ Relationship”
…before serving up heaping helpings of Fox News excerpts, with no real effort to explain their time, date or place, much less that of the events they pretend to discuss.
Then, deeper and deeper into the mysteries of “Annenberg.”
 Â
“And this was directly funded by Annenberg?”
Kurtz: “Oh, yes.”
Griffin: “Under Obama’s chairmanship?”
Kurtz: “Oh yes”
Who is this sinister Annenberg? Mob scion, ambassador, 
  dead friend of Presidents, before he died Walter Annenberg sought respectability by dumping much of his fortune into multiple foundations, one of which engaged Obama and Ayers.
Who is this Kurtz?  
The “conservative scholar” hangs his hat at the famed Ethics & Public Policy Center, the former home of Eliot “Mr. Kenilworth” Abrams. Kurtz has grown into his role as relentless Ayers pursuer, leaving behind his youthful flirtations with big think on terrorism and a prolonged period as “the ‘EverReady Bunny’ of the same-sex marriage debate“
If Jokes Could Track? 
The Coltons Point Times is unafraid to link the Palin email breakin to the toxic legacy of the Nixon era, breathlessly inquiring if Obama did it. Â
The evidence:Â lack of original thought, and statements of the obvious:
“In watching the various liberal media outlets comment about the stolen emails they used almost the exact words as Obama campaign representatives dismissing the seriousness of the theft and turning attention to the fact Sarah Palin had a private email account. Then insinuating she must have had the account to hide things from the State of Alaska. How stupid is that? Nearly everyone in America has a private email account including most members of the media…Why did the liberal media and the campaign spokespersons have the exact same script? Why did they raise the exact same issue? Why weren’t they outraged by the invasion of privacy? And why did they keep looking at the emails in their possession? If the Obama campaign was involved in the theft or any of these following actions it is the most serious breach of faith possible to the American public and would only demonstrate that a secret agenda must be driving them, one called Big Brother, where the right to privacy will no longer exist.”
Faith in CPT’s iron logic is, shall we say, undercut by his nut-ball flair. His searing indictment starts out”Privacy in America is guaranteed by the Constitution… ”
…when of course all true sons of the soil know this “right” was invented by Supreme Court Marxists to allow the proliferation of filthy birth control devices.
“We shall await the results of the federal criminal investigation.”  Watch the skies!