Remembering history the way they wished it had been
“Libraries are not monuments to the glory of the Presidents for which they are named.”
Whatever they are smoking at Redstate blog it’s clouding their vision.
Leaving aside the endless galleries of glory, if the Presidential Libraries are not monuments, whatever are these doing there?
Bush [to come]: 
After You!
In Newsweek Michael Isikoff has some new information on access to the Clinton White House papers, but wanders off into myth and misinformation on how the law, the Clintons and the Bushs came to this point.
The one thing Isikoff has is Archives documents showing that Clinton’s wishes on withholding documents are, shall we say, thorough.
No doubt the Clinton’s are interested in controlling their image and access to their papers, but this article’s brush with the state of the law on public access doesn’t help explain much.
Unlike what Isikoff says, the 1978 Presidential Records Act favored release and disclosure. The prolonged and extensive review by ex and current Presidents and their effective veto power on release is the creation of George W. Bush. Isikoff does say that Bush is under challenge in Federal Court in a convoluted wording, but his piece understates what a departure from existing law Bush made.
The Clintons are not a unique case, they are just the most recent battle over access to the record. And their interests allign with the Bush’s more than either party will acknowledge.
Isikoff’s mistaken summary of the state of law is at the bottom of his story:
“(Under the 1978 Presidential Records Act, the former president and the current president get to review White House records before they are disclosed. Either one can veto a release.) Ben Yarrow, a spokesman for Bill Clinton, says the former president was referring “in general” to a controversial 2001 Bush executive order—recently overturned, in part, by a federal judge—that authorized more extensive layers of review from both current and former presidents before papers are released. (Hillary’s campaign didn’t respond to requests for comment.)”
Coming up at the Nixon Library, the Sixth annual Fall Wine Classic!
Perhaps not the most sensitive use of the venue given his history:
ABC’s resurrection of Richard Nixon’s Fred Thompson observations [“dumb as hell,†“he isn’t very smart, is he?â€] has stirred the legions of Nixon nostalgists from their slumbers.
Presidential Multiple Guess Quiz Dean Paul Slansky tears back onto the field with a Huffington Post offering, “Contempter-in-Chief: The Richard Nixon Quiz,” demonstrating that Thompson got off easy.
Whether calling George Scultz “candy-ass,” Ronald Reagan “strange,” or sharing his views of the “SEC Jewboys,” Nixon never disappoints.
Paul Slansky: National Treasure. 
Get to know the NEW NIXON in all it’s glorious interactivity! Fans of former President Richard Nixon may turn to the nixonblog for Nixon Library event listings and links to all the right-wing blogs they might desire.
Coming soon: scourge of the Nixon White House and now chunkier of the duo of Woodward & Bernstein, 
The NEWNIXON site’s sidekicks at YouTube and Flickr are sadly lacking in that must-have flavor of the moment, usergeneratedcontent. Or anything else. They’re empty.
It’s Flyckr site boldly states that “This is a public group,” immediately followed with “Uploads to the group pool have been disabled.”
The MySpace er, space, has one member.
