We’ll Believe It When We See The Fred Malek Jew Counting* Exhibit

naftali-tieless.jpg Nifty Naftali

The impossible takes a little longer at the Nixon Library.

New Director Timothy Naftali is still winded and a little dusty from single handedly removing the old, bad, inaccurate Watergate exhibit nixon-watergate-exhibit.jpgat the Nixon Library, Museum, Birthplace and Grave.

But he found the strength to congratulate himself for booking Watergate Hero-Reporter Carl Bernstein, book touring with his Hillary Clinton biography:

I was told when I got here it couldn’t be done

The Los Angeles Times and Orange County Register followed Bernstein around the grounds nixon-bernstein-library.jpgto the Nixon birthplace home nixon-grave-birthplace.gif, but if he paused at the the nearby grave it went unreported.

*Let’s review…

redstate

 

 

Libraries are not monuments to the glory of the Presidents for which they are named.”

eisenhower-nixon-laughing.jpg

Whatever they are smoking at Redstate blog it’s clouding their vision.

Leaving aside the endless galleries of glory, if the Presidential Libraries are not monuments, whatever are these doing there?

 

Nixon: nixon-grave-stone.jpg

Reagan:reagan-grave.jpg

Bush [to come]: bush-grave-marker.jpg

It’s A Long & Winding Paper Trail

bush-clinton-library-opening.jpg After You!

In Newsweek Michael Isikoff has some new information on access to the Clinton White House papers, but wanders off into myth and misinformation on how the law, the Clintons and the Bushs came to this point.

The one thing Isikoff has is Archives documents showing that Clinton’s wishes on withholding documents are, shall we say, thorough.

No doubt the Clinton’s are interested in controlling their image and access to their papers, but this article’s brush with the state of the law on public access doesn’t help explain much.

Unlike what Isikoff says, the 1978 Presidential Records Act favored release and disclosure. The prolonged and extensive review by ex and current Presidents and their effective veto power on release is the creation of George W. Bush. Isikoff does say that Bush is under challenge in Federal Court in a convoluted wording, but his piece understates what a departure from existing law Bush made.

The Clintons are not a unique case, they are just the most recent battle over access to the record. And their interests allign with the Bush’s more than either party will acknowledge.

Isikoff’s mistaken summary of the state of law is at the bottom of his story:

“(Under the 1978 Presidential Records Act, the former president and the current president get to review White House records before they are disclosed. Either one can veto a release.) Ben Yarrow, a spokesman for Bill Clinton, says the former president was referring “in general” to a controversial 2001 Bush executive order—recently overturned, in part, by a federal judge—that authorized more extensive layers of review from both current and former presidents before papers are released. (Hillary’s campaign didn’t respond to requests for comment.)”

Bush Mocks Victims of Communism

bush-museum-logo.png

They are making with the funny in the Bush Library newsletter, headlining a stage in their current renovation as

“The Day the Wall Came Down”

bush-wall-removal.jpg

 

 

Not really the same thing.

bush-berlin-wall.jpgbush-berlin-wall.jpg

Screening Legends


Presidents pick their favorite films

George H.W. Bush digs ‘Karate Kid’

except they are showing “Quiz Show” Saturday. Is the “Show Business Bible” inerrant?

Variety reported urgent news of Presidential flick picks in quiz format – urging readers to match First Fan with their favorite movie titles.

“Karate Kid” would make more sense, in that producer Jerry Weintraub’s sole visible claim to political fame is his legendary yet inexplicable friendship with George H.W. Bush.

bush-karate-kid.jpgbush-both-uniform.jpg